Our United Nations Order of Human Rights is Not Gone - It's Under Attack. |Knowledge is Power
When criminals break our national laws, do we just say they are no longer laws? Would we want gangs to abolish our Parliaments? Why are we allowing international gangs to abolish our United Nations?
When criminals break our national laws, should we just say they are no longer laws, and deny the existence of the legislature which made them, and the courts and police which enforce them?Would we want gangs to abolish our Parliaments? Why are we allowing international gangs to abolish our United Nations?
The United Nations has mysteriously been erased.
We are being repeatedly told that “the post-war order” is “gone”.
🚨🚨🚨 WHY ARE THEY DISAPPEARING THE UN? The Davos/Epstein network, the banks, global corporates and self-styled ‘elites’ don’t want human rights, democracy or sovereignty. Don’t we want them either?
It is not a “post-war” order. War did not create order.
It is the United Nations order —the human rights we take for granted, like the right to information, to vote, to legal representation, to be free from slavery.
And countries’ right to self-government and protection from aggression.
It is not “gone.”
It is a binding treaty commitment among all governments of the world1 and forms part of every member state’s domestic law.
If we choose to ignore this, our rights that the UN created and is supposed to protect, will be lost.Then, what we are seeing the US doing, can happen in our country.
Finally an American points this out. 💯👍👍👍
That is what the UN was designed to stop.
We are now seeing why the United Nations was needed.
Who is saying this? Are we the people saying it? Do we want to throw away our entrenched human rights?
These new proposed organisations are not proposing to include universal human rights.
Who is driving this move to ignore, undermine and destroy the United Nations world order of human rights and the rule of law?
Clue: ✔Money spent on arms - would be unnecessary if the UN was functioning.
A functioning UN would have the independent standing forces required by Articles 43, 45 and 47 of its Charter, under the collective direction of the countries of the world, to prevent international aggression and threatened breaches of the peace and redirect rogue regimes into peaceful dispute settlement.
Democracies would be protected. The Millenium declaration and responsibility to protect would be spreading prosperity and security where the IMF and World Bank are currently destroying them, focusing member states on trade and the wellbeing of their citizens, where the Security Council vetos are enabling wars.
The EU has its own entrenched human rights regime, which is guaranteed because the EU does not have one King - unlike America and Russia. So long as they remain that way.
But it is the regions that don’t have human rights that are threatening others. America. Russia.
If we choose to ignore this, our rights will be gone.
***A History Lesson:***
US President Franklin D Roosevelt set up the United Nations to end international aggression - and entrench human rights in every country in the world, including the US.
But the sabotage was already in place. The power clique in the democratic party prevented Roosevelt choosing Wallace, his former vice president, for the 1944 election. Wallace like FDR wanted human rights, equality, and peace through strength - the collective strength of the governments of the world, in the United Nations. The funders of the democratic party did not. They got rid of Wallace and forced a former haberdasher, Harry Truman on FDR. FDR accepted him as the least toxic of the available choices.
Roosevelt conveniently died days before the UN Charter was due to be signed. Its other strongest proponent, Winston Churchill, was voted out days afterward. Leaving the implementation of the Charter and handling of Stalin in the hands of a novice, Truman, influenced by the interests that had backed him - what we now call neoliberals. They were opposed to even the moderate human rights and social support of the New Deal, in any country, and without the inclination to deal diplomatically with Stalin’s communism - even when the USSR was on its knees and the US had the money, influence and the Atom Bomb - to persuade him.
The entire cabinet of Roosevelt, who had put in the New Deal and the United Nations, were sacked, one by one. Truman was surrounded by advisers who had no interest in democracy, empowering countries to spread democracy by example. They were interested in domination and exploitation2.
From the moment the UN Charter was signed, before it even came into force, the US and USSR blocked formation of independent UN standing forces required by Articles 43, 45 and 47 of the Charter.
Instead of entrusting the new nuclear weapons to the United Nations as Roosevelt had planned3, Truman used them on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, triggering the nuclear arms race and the “cold war”. A euphemism for colonial proxy wars.
While the European nations granted independence to their former colonies, the US and USSR continued imperialist proxy wars and extraction, thinly veiled as forcing their competing extremist regimes on countries which had been guaranteed, for the first time ever in 1945, the right to govern themselves without interference.
Countries which had set up their own democracies were torn apart, their leaders ousted, and dictatorships installed.
BUT. On 21 December 1991 the USSR was abolished by its 8 remaining republics which unanimously committed by treaties to democracy, human rights, disarmament and denuclearisation.
Which left the US with no further excuse of saving the world from commie domination, or its violent subjugation of other countries.
So what happened?
Russia mysteriously appears in the UN, with a ‘veto’, when it has never been a member (and international law explicitly states4 UN memberships expire when the member ceases to exist and equally explicitly prohibits any form of “inheritance”). When Russia had broken away from the USSR before the USSR was abolished, so it had not even been part of the USSR.
Within months the process used to destroy democracy and instal puppet dictatorships in South America, is implemented in Russia. The country and people are asset-stripped under “urgency” without any records of where the ownership has gone - the pattern started in Guatemala 37 years earlier5. Objections by moderates wanting orderly privatisation protecting the people, resulted in firing on the Russian Parliament and transfer of power to the President in a new constitution6. Russia is taken over by oligarchs (engineered by the US: read “The Harvard Boys Do Russia7”), upgrades its nuclear weapons and facilities and grabs all the nukes on other countries’ territory — in violation of the treaties with those countries (funded and enforced by US8) — and Russia continues the proxy colonial wars.
The US has its excuse back.
Or does it?
For 22 years the US told the UN that the “Republic of China” (”Taiwan”), which had never been a member, somehow had a veto.
In 1971, the “Taiwan” delegation was expelled, by a simple majority UN Members’ resolution, which could not be vetoed. Because Taiwan did not represent any UN member.
The same must, and can easily and quickly, be done for Russian delegation, which likewise does not represent any UN member.9
The United Nations unblocked: enabling true world peace, democracy and prosperity for the first time
Without the fictional Russian “veto“ enabling Russia’s and its proteges’ violations of the law, the UN is freed to use its powers to suppress international aggression everywhere and compel peaceful dispute resolution: by assisted negotiation, and in the absence of negotiated resolution, by the International Court of Justice.
Just like our domestic systems10.
Rogue administrations attempting to abuse permanent members‘ vetos to block the UN from fulfilling its legal duty, will face the entire world community - the economic power of all their combined trading partners - with no excuses.
They are not like Russia, which appears to have manoeuvered its economy and its population for 3 decades to be immune to such pressure. The risk would be too much to even try.
Why keep the United Nations?
It’s easier to kick Russia out o f the UN11 than set up a new organisation — which would be near impossible in the current polarised political climate. The UN law is in place, embedded in every country’s domestic law.
It just needs one small resolution to free it. To return the world to a community, instead of mafia-like gang patches.
The UN is a lot better structured than the chaos of NATO. Properly functioning, it can act within 24 hours.
If a good institution is taken over by corruption, we need to get rid of the corruption. Not get rid of the institution.
We need to force our governments to take back the UN
Europe is running a dangerous game rejecting the rest of the world, it will lead to conflict. What will the global south do if the UN is shut out?
Their alternative is then to expand BRICS.
Do you really trust the people that create the poor, that create misery, That are driving these wars and not fixing them, to create a world order that you would want?
It seems we are being pushed back to the world of kings, boyars, serfs and colonies.
The so-called “world leaders” speaking at Davos WEF have overruled the UN for decades. They have made no attempt to remove the impostor.
They have made the world of wars as we know it. Do we want them to abolish the United Nations?
If we do nothing, we deserve it.
Now you know the truth, sign the petition.
Footnotes, further reading
Except Russia, which has never applied, and 3 self-governing states which have been blocked from joining: Taiwan, Palestine, Western Sahara.
See: What the Wolfowitz Doctrine tells us about the Infiltration of Russia into the United Nations | Knowledge is Power
What the Wolfowitz Doctrine tells us about the Infiltration of Russia into the United Nations | Knowledge is Power
The Wolfowitz Doctrine explains the purpose of the illegal infiltration of Russia into the United Nations, when it is not and never has been a member.
According to VP Wallace - source TBA
1962-12-03 International Law Commission “The succession of States in relation to membership in the United Nations: memorandum prepared by the Secretariat”, paragraphs 14, 16 https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_149.pdf
:
The Harvard Boys Do Russia | The Nation, 1998, Janine R. Wedel https://www.thenation.com/article/world/harvard-boys-do-russia/
See When the West Defanged Ukraine. https://www.americanpurpose.com/articles/when-the-west-defanged-ukraine/
See the complete, comprehensive, step by step details of the law and facts of Russia’s true status in relation to the USSR and the UN, refuting Russia’s claim, disproving every counter-argument, at
Russia's Membership Status in the United Nations - The Documents
The video and documents proving Russia is not in the UN, and its representatives can be expelled by a simple majority (of members present and voting, abstentions aren’t counted) resolution of the UN General Assembly, within a week. No veto, no "reform".
BUT - our systems are corrupted by the very people blocking the UN. So they can, and must, also be fixed, to work properly for the good of all. The way to do this: see
Fiduciary Government — Make Government Accountable Like the Private Sector, and They Will Work. | Knowledge is Power
We are told our governments are “representative democracy”. Accountable. Have Fiduciary Duty. Are not above the law. All FALSE. But if we make it true, they will perform near perfectly.
see:
The Taiwan case: How to Kick Russia Out of the UN Easily! | Knowledge is Power
How the US twisted a simple case on expulsion of trespassers which did not represent a member state, into lies about the UN - and how the UN solved it with a simple members resolution.