Taiwan, Then Russia — America's 70 years Strangulation of the United Nations, and how the members ended it | Knowledge is Power
In 1971 the US' lie that a country which was not even a member of the United Nations, had a veto, was exposed. 20 years later the same person, GHW Bush, told the world the exact same lie.
In 1971 the US’ lie that a country which was not even a member of the United Nations, had a veto, was exposed. 20 years later the same person, GHW Bush, told the world the exact same lie, about Russia. And no one has pointed it out. Until now.
This is a stub, but here is all the information you need, to see the exact same lies about Russia, and the simple easy solution.
"Seats" in the United Nations - a vexed concept which applies to only 10 memberships | Knowledge is Power
Countries’ memberships of the United Nations, and the permanent memberships of the Security Council cannot be transferred like “seats”. They attach to states themselves, and end when a state ceases to exist. READ IT TO THE END! 💥
For the curious, here’s the facts on China’s claim to Taiwan:
Did Taiwan ever Belong to China? |Knowledge is Power
Taiwan was not China. China renounced sovereignty over it in 1895, in a Treaty ceding it to Japan. In 1952 Japan renounced its sovereignty over Taiwan. Leaving Taiwan an independent sovereign nation.
The Taiwan case: How to Kick Russia Out of the UN Easily! | Knowledge is Power
In 1971 US had lied to the UN for 22 years that Taiwan was a member, when it had never joined.
Why?
Human rights, democracy, sovereignty and the rule of law are an existential threat to the malignantly greedy class which has owned the US and controlled its governments for most of its existence.
One US President, Franklin D Roosevelt, decided to entrench human rights, protect countries’ sovereignty and end international aggression. He inspired the (semi1) democratic nations of the world to form the United Nations, which turned those ideas into law. And they committed to give it the power to enforce that law.
The extractor class in the US united swiftly to disable those rights. They were helped by the imperialist, anti-human rights USSR2 which exercised its veto to stop the UN doing its job and blocked from the start the formation of UN forces required by Articles 43,45 and 47 of the United Nations Charter — making it appear “toothless”. The USSR and the US classes had one thing in common: they did not want peace or human rights to be enforced. They wanted power and riches — domination and exploitation.
They set up the IMF and World bank to substitute economic colonialism to replace their charming habit of military invasions and coups which they had used to enslave and disenfranchise the populations of countries and take their resources3. Those nice institutions required, as a condition of any loans, the stripping of the borrower countries’ assets - thus removing the countries’ ability to ever repay the loans, buying up their businesses and resources for next to nothing, leaving the people in debt slavery and their governments powerless to help them or rebuild their economies.
They ran a propaganda campaign through the United States, that the United Nations - which created guaranteed universal human rights - “will take away your rights”. They didn’t want black people having the vote. They didn’t want to give up their economic slavery, or the prospect of return of real physical slavery - already used in many countries. They didn’t want people to have the right to marry whom they wished or to lower the birth rate by having control over their own bodies (which should naturally have led to a well looked after, empowered society). They didn’t want education, freedom of speech and living wages, for the people they were exploiting. And, for good measure, they said that the United Nations would take away Americans’ guns (it did not) and would take away America’s ‘sovereignty’. (This is the world military alliance, set up to create and protect each other’s sovereignty. “America’s sovereignty” was some how morphed from independent self government, into the ability to destroy and plunder other sovereign nations at will.)
And when the Chinese people rebelled against the exploitation that had almost the entire population facing starvation, enslavement and poverty, those malignantly greedy did not want a country which looked after its people questioning them in that international alliance, maybe siding with the USSR challenging their extraction. So they invented a lie to keep China out of the United Nations.
They claimed that Taiwan, a small island which had never been more than an outlying region claimed but not governed by China, and had been signed over to Japan by China’s then ruling Qin dynasty in 1895, was somehow entitled to China’s UN membership. This incredible concoction was based on the fact that the Allies had captured Taiwan from Japan, and appointed4 the soon to be deposed ruler of China, as the Allies’ agent for the Allied military occupation of Taiwan.
When Chiang Kai-Shek and his Kuomintang were duly deposed as the government of China (equivalent to, say, Trump being voted out in 2020), they fled to Taiwan, and for 22 years the US successfully bullied the UN into letting Chiang Kai-Shek’s stateless “Republic of China” regime use China’s votes and veto in the UN and the UN Security Council.
That’s exactly like Trump after he is ousted fleeing to the Chamizal Strip (ceded by the US to Mexico in 1964) and claiming to exercise the United States’ veto. Then later claiming the Chamizal Strip somehow owns the US veto.
Of course, that made Chiang Kai Shek America’s puppet. He was dependent on US protection for his enormous power, to bring the entire UN to a standstill; and probably for his life. If he didn’t do what the US wanted, he lost everything.
Finally 1 little country tabled a resolution that exposed the fraud, and the world expelled the Kuomintang impostors and recognised the membership rights of the government of China. Soon after that, military rule came to an end and Taiwan has democratically governed itself ever since. It is a sovereign state. But blocked from joining the UN by some rather strange circumstances - which I shall come back and outline later as I fill this out.
Interestingly, the last US representative in the UN to repeat the lies, was one George H. W. Bush.
20 years later the same G H W Bush administration invented a fiction called a “continuator” and told exactly the same lie to the UN, that Russia, a non UN member state which had seceded from the USSR, was somehow a member of the United Nations when it had never joined, what is more, that it somehow had the USSR’s veto - which, by very clear law, had ceased to exist when the USSR did.
Despite the truth being in plain view on the UN web site5, that fallacy has been repeated to the present time.
How the American lies were exposed and Taiwan was expelled.
The exact same law applies: Taiwan was not a member. Russia is not a member.
The only states entitled to participate in the United Nations are the members. And states can only become members through the procedures set out in the United Nations Charter - application, approval by the Security council, and a 2/3 majority vote of the existing members6.
And all it needs is exactly the same resolution to correct it.
The US chicanery
The discussion which led to the vote is eye opening. The speech of G H W Bush is eye-watering.
You can read the meeting record in full on the United Nations Web site. Bush is at [105]. Albania, which explains the US lies and provides the correct law and facts, which were accepted by the General Assembly, is at [59].
Here are some excerpts which may look all too familiar.
How could all the countries which attended that session, and voted on that day, 25 October 1971, have forgotten?
The “consent” argument
Actually, Taiwan at least had some sort of claim to a dispute - the UN membership actually did express some sort of oblique “consent” - based on a claim that the occupiers of Taiwan were the “rightful” rulers of China - unlike in the case of Russia.
Unlike Russia’s case - which is crystal clear. It was never the USSR. It left the USSR. It had no claim ever to “rule” the USSR - which after 21 December 1991 did not even exist7. And the law specifically provides that it could not be a UN Member unless admitted under the UN Charter.
Next:
Now you know the truth - sign the petition!
See - for example -
In communism, individuals are subordinate to the “State” — which is of course controlled by the siloviki (controllers of violence) and nomenklatura (political/administrative controllers) — the privileged sub-oligarchical extractors. Equivalent to the aristocracy, and Franklin D Roosevelt’s “economic royalty” who control governments in capitalist regimes.
See for example: South America - the blueprint for the asset-stripping and breaking of Russia, turning it into a resource provider for the global oligopoly/extractor class.
Allied General Command order no. 1:
For full details blow by blow with all documentation of the fact and law, (it’s LONG), see
For the full detail on that, see ibid. Membership provisions: Since Russia did not “inherit” USSR’s memberships, how could it possibly be a UN member?
See: